I actually remember the first time I saw a copy of Raymond Murphy’s English Grammar in Use. I hadn’t been teaching long and I was sitting on a bus in Brasília, going from one class to another, when I spotted it. “Sounds like the kind of book I need to read” I joked half seriously to myself.
“It was the summer of 1982. The year before we had been glued to our tiny red TV set to watch what I consider the most beautiful TV drama series I have ever seen. Brideshead Revisited, based on the novel by Evelyn Waugh (1945), was serialized for ITV and became immensely popular in Britain and also in Flanders. The story, the themes, the actors, the settings, the costumes, the language and the music mesmerized and enchanted us. The young and then unknown actor Jeremy Irons played the main character, who – in a long flashback- tells the story in an off screen voice
That rich English prose of Waugh, read by Irons, is sheer beauty turned into sound and it can still move me after 31 years as it moved the 24 year old me in 1981. The beginning of the series is set in Oxford and the city attracted me enormously.
I had just finished my first full school year as a teacher but I knew there was still so much English to learn so although I was getting married in August I was determined to do a summer course first. Of course it had to be in Oxford and so in July 1982 I travelled to England to spend three weeks at the Swan School of English.
An early prototype of what was to become the most popular ELT grammar book in the world.
I entered a world that is so familiar to many of you but that was exotic and exciting to me: an English language school. I had never seen a school building that was in fact “a house”. An intricate layout of floors, rooms and staircases, wall to wall carpets and a garden!
Whiteboards, desks put in a U shape, tea breaks and a social programme of pub crawls (new word for me!) and coach trips during the weekends. Stratford-upon-Avon: Yay!
I had booked a room in a university college building so that meant a lot of time on my own in the evenings and during weekends. Studying, reading, listening to the radio. A dream holiday in the city of dreaming spires.
On the first day of the course we had to do a placement test and I ended up in Mr Murphy’s class. Mr Murphy, Ray, was a gentle, soft-spoken and very friendly man, who welcomed us every morning while music was playing in his classroom (I loved that!). The days were full of surprises as I had no idea what to expect. We learnt new words, did some intonation exercises, he taught us idioms and phrasal verbs, we did role plays and had discussions, listened to news broadcasts and wrote about the topics we had discussed in class. He corrected our work and gave feedback.
I will be forever grateful for his lessons, for his grammar book(s) and for introducing me to Michael Swan’s Practical English Usage, which was exactly what I needed and which I still recommend to my students today.
I would like to conclude by some thoughts on textbooks and on grammar.
A highly successful, bestselling author who recognises a student after 22 years, is still a teacher at heart I guess.”
|Mieke and Raymond are in there somewhere if you can spot them|
After reading this article, Raymond Murphy was kind enough to get in touch with Mieke and thank her for the article. Thanks to Ian Cook (@idc74) at Cambridge University Press for passing it on to him.
12 thoughts on “Guest Post: Mieke Kenis on Raymond Murphy”
Love the story n connections. Nice to read a Mieke post too!
What a great read! Both of you describe the setting, the book and the teacher in such a vivid way.
None of it is familiar to me – here we use our local text books with our very own “stars” and I have not encountered the book. Mieke's description of the language school was fascinating as I haven't experienced that either!
Always makes one feel good to read about an awesome teacher – they deserve the credit!
If I had to choose one thing to focus on in this great post, this would be it:
“Of course we should concentrate on communication and we have come a long way since the days of grammar- based courses but I hope that native speaker teachers who call their courses learner-centered will let the learner decide on this too.
If we, learners, want accuracy, please don’t deny us accuracy. Allow us, learners, to decide how accurate we want to be or how much like a native speaker we want to sound and how much British / American culture we want to learn.”
It's funny how often we talk about learner-centeredness and yet fail to realise that, by making the decision that communication is far more important that accuracy we're denying learners the power of choice and starting from a very teacher-centered perspective. What if learner do want to sound as close to native speakers after all?
This going to sound absolutely terrible … but a lot of the time (not all of the time) learners don't know enough about the subject to make useful choices for themselves.
Yep, that does sound absolutely terrible. “Teacher knows best” in your class eh?
Sorry, but it doesn't sound that terrible – it was pretty carefully hedged, after all. There are * a lot * of false assumptions about language and language learning around, and anyone can be taken in by them.
Thank you, Brad and Naomi, for your kind words.
The fact that the book is not known at all in some parts of the world shows how diverse the world of EFL is.
We assume that EFL teaching will be more or less the same everywhere but there are still a lot of local, cultural or just practical issues that play an important role in the choices that EFL teachers(can) make.
I like to believe that books, methodologies, approaches or teaching styles all have their own value as long as a teacher can inspire and motivate learners.
Thanks for your comment, Henrick.
My point was indeed that although communication is the most important thing, some learners might want to be as accurate as possible too.
I think that people who are interested in language, find that important, also in their native language but that is indeed a choice that every learner/speaker has to make for themselves to a certain extent.
How do we measure language proficiency after all? Is it just a wider vocabulary, more idiomatic use of the language, mastering more registers, a more native-like accent? For me it is all of these but definitely also accuracy.
Hi Henrick and Mieke. I just wanted to comment on the perception that you have about native teachers and students needs. I think that most teachers that are here in our PLN and talk, tweet and blog about leaner centred-ness, fluency over accuracy, respecting different accents and so on, are coming from the right place.
The distinction is between teachers who DECIDE that this is what the students need rather than BELIEVE that this is what they need. If a student wants to be very accurate and focus on only on writing, say, then that's fine with me because it's their choice and it's not being imposed by me and my beliefs. I'm not sure it's the best way, and I'd advise them of this, but ultimately they are paying me for a service and I will deliver it (don't get me wrong, I wouldn't teach anything to anyone and if I didn't want to do it I would tell them to find another teacher).
As Scott Thornbury said in the iTDi error correction webinar, if your students are air traffic controllers then accuracy is very important. What we have to do as teachers is respond to the situation as we see it, and the reality is that most people that I teach need fluency far more than they need accuracy. Give me enough time with them and they'll get both!
Hi Mieke and James!
James, thanks for having one of my favourite people write for your blog (now that I have heard what her voice sounds like, I felt like she was telling us her story, not writing it : )
Mieke, I loved reading about it – how lucky, Raymond Murphy was your teacher – wow! (I'm having a nerd-moment there ha ha!)
I love what you say about textbooks and how fortunate people are to have them when they are learning a language. And what you say about accuracy – amazing!
And in the picture, I think I have found you in the right side of the photo, in a dark blue shirt, right? Is Professor Murphy in the pink shirt?
Thank you so much for this great post!
Big hugs to you both,
Thank you so much for your kind words.
You are far too sweet, as always:-)
As to the picture: the clue was blue.
I am indeed the one with her eyes closed – I am not good at being in pictures – and Mr Murphy is the one in the middle with the dark blue shirt.
Just behind me was one of my classmates, a teacher from… Greece.
Writing this story was a great trip down memory lane and it ended in a way I could never have expected.
So, thanks again, James, for inviting me as your guest here.
This is interesting. Yes, the best-selling grammar textbook, as they say. Yet I wonder what he's doing now and if he's written any books recently? Does he still teach?
I wonder what people nowadays think of this book. I've used it a lot in my teaching but I'm always on the lookout for other good grammar books. Maybe the grass is always greener on the other side…
I loved the part about the teacher still recognizing the student after more than 2 decades? Wow..